Does the Online Safety Bill put people’s privacy at risk?

Courtesy of Jefferson Santos on Unsplash

by Seham Al Amshan and Alexandra Flores

WhatsApp and Signal messaging apps have signed an open letter opposing the final reading of the Online Safety Bill, which would allow Ofcom access to people’s end-to-end encrypted messages. The government says this would avoid child abuse, terrorism content and any illegal forms being shared.

The government’s purpose to do this was to ensure the safety of children and to also tackle any online harm, according to Oxford Internet Institute Director Victoria Nash and Visiting Policy Fellow Lisa Felton. Companies like Meta are urging the government to revise the Online Safety Bill if the law undermines their encryption services.

The Signal app also posted a tweet showing their disagreement. Twitter is full of support for these apps to oppose the law, and stop putting people’s privacy at risk.

Courtesy of Twitter
Courtesy of Twitter

Students’ opinion on the revised Online Safety Bill (OSB)

”I think it is an issue of privacy but also a security issue; the law is not right on accessing people’s data but they should be strict on the companies that needs to be checked to detect who is manipulating in sharing personal data,” said Muhammad Affaraz, 26, who studies Artificial Intelligence at London Met.

The messages are scanned by a software on a device before they are encrypted and that is with the help of a technique called client-side scanning, according to the BBC.

According to Article 19, the House of Lords should think about modifying the Bill because of its impact on human rights, or the UK will not be a safe place for people to express themselves freely.

Lord Clement-Jones, a Liberal Democrat digital-economy spokesperson, told the BBC : ‘We need to know the government’s intentions on this.’

Dr Graham Taylor-Russell Courtesy of London Metropolitan University website

Dr Graham Taylor-Russell, a lecturer in Cryptography at London Met said, ‘It permits the broad surveillance of all users of systems like WhatsApp. There is no technical way to deliver what the government wants without dismantling the privacy protections all private citizens have a right to.’

An article published by The Spectator states that, WhatsApp has warned that they will effectively quit in the UK if the bill is not revised as it puts their end-to-en encryption at a risk.

Dr Graham Taylor-Russell also said, ‘For these reasons, recognising that there are some positive parts of what is a wide ranging bill, I am opposed to the specific bits that restrict the use of encryption by private citizens. They are unlikely to be effective in the way the bill’s supporters claim and will erode hard won protections.’

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*